The remedy fits the record
Enforcement, damages or rescission chosen for what your documents can actually prove — not for what sounds strongest.
Breach of contract litigation in Israel: Aun & Co. enforces and defends commercial agreements — damages, enforcement, rescission and agreed-compensation claims.
A breach case looks simple and rarely is: the contract says one thing, the correspondence says another, and both sides performed imperfectly. Israeli law under the Contracts (Remedies for Breach of Contract) Law 1970 offers enforcement, rescission and damages — including agreed compensation clauses — but the winning route depends on what the record actually supports. The firm reads the whole performance history before choosing the remedy to lead with.
The firm reconstructs performance day by day: deliveries, payments, complaints, silences. Breach cases are usually won on the correspondence around the contract rather than the contract itself — who gave notice, who waived, who kept performing. The remedy is then chosen for the record you have: enforcement where performance is provable, damages where loss is quantifiable, rescission where the numbers say walk.
Enforcement, damages or rescission chosen for what your documents can actually prove — not for what sounds strongest.
Notices and cure periods executed by the book, so ending the contract does not become the other side's cause of action.
Loss calculated from source documents with causation mapped, because damages that cannot be traced get cut.
A typical engagement: a supplier under a multi-year agreement faces a customer who stopped paying and alleges defects raised for the first time after the invoices. The firm rebuilds the acceptance history from delivery records and correspondence, then sues on the undisputed debt while isolating the defect story.
Described in abbreviated, anonymised form to preserve client confidentiality.

Three main ones under the Contracts (Remedies) Law 1970: enforcement of the contract, rescission with mutual restitution, and damages — including agreed compensation where the contract fixes it. They can be combined, within limits, and the right lead remedy depends on the evidence.
Yes — agreed compensation is enforceable without proof of loss, but the court may reduce it if it bears no reasonable relation to the harm foreseeable at signing. The fight is usually over reduction, not validity.
For rescission, a cure notice is generally required unless the breach is fundamental. Beyond the legal minimum, a precise demand letter is strategy: it fixes the record, starts clocks, and often reveals the defence you will face.